Relationships begin with simple gestures and often end the same way. Itâs what happens in between â the emotions, the fights, the breakups â that have lasting impact, an impact that can last weeks, months, or even years. Itâs these things, this âin-betweenâ stuff, that is examined in director Hunter Richardâs 2005 effort “London” a psychological mind-trip of a movie that is every bit as somber and depressing as its characters. Yet amidst the anger, the fights, the god-cursing and the drugs, the film manages to strike a sober commentary on relationships â not the good parts we remember and store for a rainy day, but the bad parts, the throes that have the capacity to send us off a cliff on mornings when we draw the blinds and see only bleak hopelessness stretching out before us.
The film opens with this view, as we glimpse its protagonist take a hit from a bong in a disheveled Manhattan apartment and attempt to pass out once again. The lights are out but itâs pure daylight; the only thing that prevents him from passing out once again is a phone call that sends him into a spiral â a friend informs him that his ex-girlfriend, a girl named âLondonâ is having a going away party that night and plans to leave town. The lad begins throwing thingsâŚfirst the phone, then the TV, and finally a basketball straight through a fish tank, heading out into the rain to meet a cocaine dealer in a shady bar while contemplating his next move.
The protagonist is Syd, played with a surprising deal of deft and heart by Chris Evans, better known for his male-model looks and superhero flicks, âCaptain America,â âThe Fantastic Four,â and âThe Avengers.â The dealer in the bar is also a man weâve seen before, but never like this. Jason Statham takes the role of âBateman,â who, at first glance appears to be a upper-class banker with a drug side business, but a man who we soon learn much more about as he and Syd tackle the ugly side of life from a locked bathroom of the penthouse where Londonâs going away party is being held.

On the surface, âLondon,â is an expose on failed relationships that wonât let go, and the images that haunt us as we try and move on. London is also a woman, played here by Jessica Biel, with a performance, I must say, I wasnât expecting given her squeaky clean genesis in TVâs â7th Heaven,â or depthless follow-ups in movies such as “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” or âSummer Catch.â Here she is sexy, dangerous, a bit vulnerable, and, underneath it all, frustrated. Much of the movie is told through flashbacks of her relationship with Syd from his point of view, showing arguments on innocuous topics: sex, jealousy, religion, humanity. Syd is the type of person who needs to push at things, who needs to know heâs right, even if it costs him the women he loves. In fact, this is one of the reasons he loses her: he canât say those three little words, obsessed with the futility of trying to define human relationships with social convention.
This movie is not subtle. Itâs rated âRâ and definitely earns it with a script with easily as man f-bombs as the office drama “Glengarry Glen Ross” or any episode of TVâs âDeadwood,â yet interweaves this with insightful dialogue about love, pain, and the dolor that often accompanies the human condition. Most of the acting is passable, particularly from Evans and Statham, who make you forget the action movies that lined their past with what borders on decent emoting. However, the inclusion of other actors is at times nonsensical, most notably the histrionics from Isla Fisher (âWedding Crashersâ) toward the filmâs end, as well as the decision to cast Dane Cook as a partygoer, whose sarcastic style really clashes with a film that tries very hard to stay on the level.
The movie deserves credit for its attempt to show not the chronology of a relationship, but the bits and pieces that make up its whole. Some scenes are over the top (such as a shouting match between Evans and Statham that rides a precarious line between honest discovery and male bravado), while some are markedly shorter than most people would like whoâve stayed around for the filmâs 92-minute run-time. The filmâs much-anticipated third act, the eventual meeting between London and Syd, feels rushed and doesnât offer any kind of resolution. However, maybe itâs not supposed to; these arenât innocents, but battle-scarred losers in a game of love, a loss that leads to heavy depression, panic attacks, drug addiction and even hints at suicide. âLondonâ feels like a cautionary tale, though weâre not often sure of what.
At the end of the day, âLondonâ isnât a perfect movie, or even one of the top-ten on the subject. Films like âHigh Fidelityâ and âEternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mindâ do an infinitely better job addressing romantic loss, while occasionally throwing the audience a joke or two to keep them from slitting their wrists. However, it does offer an interesting presentation (most of the film takes place in a locked penthouse bathroom), decent acting from most of the cast, as well as a somber soundtrack and a focused lens on people living in New York City weâre not used to seeing. The movie will make you thinkâŚhowever, after itâs over, you may want to walk outside and take a breath of fresh air. âLondon,â like the cigarette smoke and drugs that inhabit it, tends to hang in the air even after the closing credits.
– by Mark Ziobro


