Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Friday, March 6
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky
    The Movie Buff
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    Project Bond

    ‘Moonraker’ Review: Moore’s Great as 007, but the Film Loses Something as it Heads to Space

    Mark ZiobroBy Mark ZiobroNovember 29, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Moonraker
    Lois Chiles and Roger Moore in "Moonraker." (Photo: Eon Productions, 1979).
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    Before I watched “Moonraker,” I never realized that Arnold and the film “Eraser” ripped off that daring parachute scene. Granted, Arnold’s is more exciting—with more engaging cinematography—but Roger Moore did it first. It was also during my viewing of “Moonraker” I realized that Moore plays a very good Bond. He’s more physically filled out than Sean Connery, which makes the fight scenes more believable, and he’s far cheekier. He plays to the spy’s British wit devilishly, and the script by Christopher Wood also makes him educated in a nuanced way. None of the other Bond films I’ve watched showed the man savvy in science or world politics, and it makes for a more believable spy. The film is imperfect, though, as expected from a 1979 production compared to modernity. Yet it holds its own until its space action finale, which unfortunately destroys a lot of the film’s credibility. 

    What works about “Moonraker”—as with most of the early Bond films before Dalton took the reins—was the focus on sleuthing as opposed to all-out action. Bond is debonair and uses his charm to his benefit. Here, M (Bernard Lee) sends him to investigate the disappearance of a missing space shuttle belonging to the billionaire Drax (Michael Lonsdale), and it’s clear from the start that Drax is himself involved. Bond starts exploring, first meeting the lovely Corrine (Corinne Cléry) and then the scientist Dr. Holly Goodhead (really?), played with good sport by Lois Chiles. The typical Bond chauvinism aside, in short time one of Drax’s minions (Toshirô Suga) tries to kill him, and he’s pretty sure he’s stumbled upon something bigger. 

    Moore is a Fun, Cheeky Bond

    One of the main issues with “Moonraker” is it’s too long at 2 hours and 6 mins. Its slow pace makes it feel like 2 and a half. Part of this is due to the slogging pace as Bond attempts to uncover Drax’s plan, and part has to do with time period. Most of the action involves men in suits trading blows with each other, and the lighting and cinematography by Jean Tournier is so steady and even it doesn’t do much to raise the intrigue. This is a product of the times, an epoch where men wore suits and acted politely. The idea of them engaging in fist fights while wearing them was absurd. However, one sequence—as Bond motors a boat through Brazil’s Amazon—is high action comedy. Bond utilizes mines, torpedoes, and more to evade the enemy. And as bodies literally fall from the sky after a boat explosion, you can “Moonraker” is trying to have fun and use its $34M budget well. 

    The other issue with the film is its chief villain, Drax (*spoilers ahead*) is not very believable as one. Lonsdale plays him flatly, with little-to-no direction, wearing long, conservative suits with arms crossed and buttoned collars, almost resembling a monk. He plans to utilize a grand space station (hidden from satellite reads, of course) to exterminate Earth’s humans and replace them with “perfect” specimens. The inspiration of eugenics and the Nazi Holocaust aside, the most unbelievable thing is the monotone way Drax narrates his plan. I honestly almost missed his grand scheme it was so drably recited, and Drax doesn’t seem to have any real motivation or stake in it at all. It was a 180 degree turn from “Goldfinger,” where the villain’s plan—as absurd as it was—seemed to have inspiration.

    Jet-Setting as Usual

    Moonraker
    Michael Lonsdale as Drax in “Moonraker.” (Photo: Eon Productions, 1979).

    “Moonraker” certainly has its share of jet setting, as the film moves from Florida, to Brazil, and more, and one of its more exhilarating scenes takes place atop a mountain gondola. It’s here we meet “Jaws,” a monstrous villain who has metal for teeth, played greatly by actor Richard Kiel. As Bond and Goodhead watch in horror as he comes after them, Moore delivers the best line of the movie when she asks if he knows him: “Not socially. His name is Jaws. He kills people.” Director Gilbert and Moore’s dedication to keeping Bond the consummate gentleman in this film is what makes up a lot of the movie’s humor. 

    Kiel is also a lot of fun to watch—though he never talks—and I found it amusing the filmmakers even sought to have him meet a woman who isn’t afraid of him (Blanche Ravalec), who would become his girlfriend. It’s also progressive that Gilbert and writer Wood use logic towards the end to have Bond convince Jaws to come to his aid. Without being obvious, Ravelec’s big smile full of braces—and Bond’s entreaty to Jaws to stand against a man who seeks to wipe out imperfect people that look like him—make stronger points toward acceptance and tolerance than it might have intended. 

    ‘Moonraker’s Third Act is a Bit Comical

    Moonraker
    Richard Kiel as ‘Jaws’ in “Moonraker.” (Photo: Eon Productions, 1979).

    Regrettably, to me the film falls apart at the end aboard Drax’s spaceship in a sequence that culminates in a full on laser battle, complete with astronauts and jet packs, looking like something George Lucas cooked up. I’m unsure why the film took this direction, if not to follow in “Star Wars’” footsteps, assuming people were keenly asking for more space operas. However, the film did earn a Saturn Award nomination for “Best Science Fiction Film,” so maybe many felt it worked. To me, it takes us out of the Bond experience and seems comical. It’s no fault of Moore, Kiel, or even Lonsdale, but a script that’s more ambitious than it needed to be. By the time the film ends, and Bond saves the day, it’s hard to remember how we got there. Although when Drax finally gets his comeuppance, it is quite hysterical to watch. 

    All-in-all, “Moonraker” is a modestly fun Bond film, even if it loses itself in the end. Moore is great as 007, and I look forward to seeing more of him as I continue through ‘Project Bond’ this coming year. Apart from Lonsdale, the ancillary players (especially Chiles and Kiel) do well here, and the film includes some thrilling chase sequences that were ahead of its time. The picture offers social commentary that seemed more forward thinking than Bond films had up to that point, and alongside Moore’s British cheekiness it fits right into the franchise. Only eleven films in, “Moonraker” has much to offer as long as you can overlook its sillier bits. Ultimately, it’s a fine Bond film that’s not likely to upset many fans of the franchise. 

    007 James Bond Lois Chiles Michael Lonsdale Project Bond Roger Moore space spy
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous Article‘Hamnet’ QCinema 2025 Review: A Masterclass in Grief, Even When the Score Won’t Shut Up
    Next Article ‘A Very Vintage Christmas’ Review: Formulaic and Predictable, but ’90s Star Tia Mowry Provides Enough Charm to Make Watching Worthwhile
    Mark Ziobro
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn

    Mark is a lifetime film lover and founder and Chief Editor of The Movie Buff. His favorite genres are horror, drama, and independent. He misses movie rental stores and is always on the lookout for unsung movies to experience.

    Related Posts

    Drama March 4, 2026

    ‘Rosemead’ Review: A Mother and Son Stare Down the Barrel in a Tragic Eye-Opener

    Independent March 2, 2026

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    Horror March 2, 2026

    ‘Scream 7’ Review: A New Chapter as the Franchise Rewrites the Rules

    Drama March 1, 2026

    “Wuthering Heights” (2026) Review: A Preposterous Retelling, Rich in Aesthetic Yet Weightless in Text

    Action February 26, 2026

    ‘Man on Fire:’ Violent and Unforgiving, but Features Both Denzel and Fanning at their Best

    Action February 22, 2026

    ‘Mercy’ Review: Chris Pratt is One Angry Man

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Rosemead’ Review: A Mother and Son Stare Down the Barrel in a Tragic Eye-Opener

    By Vidal DcostaMarch 4, 20260

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    By Mark ZiobroMarch 2, 20260

    ‘Scream 7’ Review: A New Chapter as the Franchise Rewrites the Rules

    By Holly MarieMarch 2, 20260

    “Wuthering Heights” (2026) Review: A Preposterous Retelling, Rich in Aesthetic Yet Weightless in Text

    By Hector GonzalezMarch 1, 20260
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Rosemead’ Review: A Mother and Son Stare Down the Barrel in a Tragic Eye-Opener

    By Vidal DcostaMarch 4, 20260

    “Rosemead” is based on “A dying mother’s plan: Buy a gun. Rent a hotel room.…

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    By Mark ZiobroMarch 2, 20260

    Review: Rough Sex and Rougher Relationship Dynamics Intertwine in the Risqué ‘Pillion’

    By Vidal DcostaFebruary 24, 20260

    Interview: Filmmaker Sriram Emani on Exploring Self-Erasure and Breaking Patterns in his Debut Short ‘Jam Boy’

    By Vidal DcostaFebruary 20, 20260

    Acclaimed Violinist Lara St. John Talks About ‘Dear Lara’ Doc in Post SBIFF Interview

    By Mark ZiobroFebruary 16, 20260
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘The Innocents’ Review: One of the First Haunted House Films of the Modern Horror Era

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    The Movie Buff is a multimedia platform devoted to covering all forms of entertainment. From Hollywood Blockbusters to Classic Comfort faves. Broadcast Television, on-demand streaming, bingeworthy series'; We're the most versatile source.

    The Movie Buff is also the leading supporter of Indie film, covering all genres and budgets from around the globe.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.