Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Friday, March 6
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Bluesky
    The Movie Buff
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    Feature Article

    Feature: Humanity Has to Be Surpassed—Kubrick and Nietzsche in ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’

    Abirbhab MaitraBy Abirbhab MaitraFebruary 22, 2022No Comments7 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    2001
    Keir Dullea in "2001: A Space Odyssey." (Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM).
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    I remember the first time I saw “2001: A Space Odyssey” on my computer screen, I regretted not being able to experience it on the big screen. Often considered as one of the greatest cinematic experiences, the great Stanley Kubrick’s “2001” is an exhilarating ride into the abyss of the unknown. Filled with breathtaking visuals and extravagance, it’s surreal to wonder how Kubrick achieve the enormous amount of precise finesse in an age where the filmmaking technologies were not as par as today; but still, it looks better even in today’s standards. 

    Apart from all these extravagances, from the core “2001” is a complex philosophical movie. The philosophy of 19th Century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is profoundly seen throughout the movie. One of his most famous aphorisms of evolution of humanity from its primitiveness to the higher self can be seen in “2001” from its alpha to omega. From the very first frame, Kubrick establishes this notion. With stunning imagery of a solar eclipse accompanied by Richard Strauss’ enigmatic musical piece “Also Sprach Zarathustra” (also inspired from Nietzsche’s writing), Kubrick directly references Nietzsche in his modern-day human odyssey. 

    Humanity Has to be Surpassed – Establishing the Notion

    2001
    A scene from “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM).

    The first shot resembles the opening of Nietzsche’s “Thus Spoke Zarathustra,” where it opens with Zarathustra’s worship of the sun for its overflowing radiation of wisdom over humanity. Resembling Zarathustra, Kubrick uses this metaphor as his offering of admiration for the great star by establishing it as a symbol of the source of the Universe. A source from which everything was created in this cosmos in the form of the primary matter of stardust.   

    He then jumps to the “Dawn of Man” sequence, linking the pathway of evolution from the primitive stardust to the primates. Eventually, this evolution leads us to the human of the 21st Century with the famous match cut from a bone to a space shuttle. With the rapid shift from the primates to the modern man, Kubrick conjugates Nietzsche’s idea about the evolution from primitivism to a higher self.    

    But becoming human is not the endpoint of this evolution. “Humanity has to be surpassed,” thus spoke Nietzsche. Thus become a modern human with achieving and establishing its superiority is not the extreme end of this evolution. It’s yet to become the superman, the surpassing being of humanity. In one of his wonderful quotes, he stated, “Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the superman—a rope over an abyss.” 

    Dive into the Dangerous Abyss in the Form of Space Exploration – Journey towards the Superman 

    2001
    A scene from “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM).

    Kubrick profoundly illustrates the constant urge to overcome humanity in the context of space exploration. From the point of the jump cut, he throws us to the world of unknown in space. The space here signifies the abyss over which humans float with their spaceships. It is a dangerous abyss, where the rules of the world do not apply. Humans have to re-learn normal things there such as eating, sleeping, communicating with others, and even how to use the bathroom (zero-gravity toilet). In these things, we can interpret them as a metaphor for the progression towards advancement to become superman.     

    David Bowman as the Starchild

    2001
    A scene from “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM).

    But not everyone can be superman. In the movie, only David Bowman reaches Jupiter and through the stargate, he enters the enlightened cave of eternal recurrence. In the end sequence, it reveals that he ages rapidly and eventually dies and become a child again. 

    This child is the last stage of overcoming humanity.  He is the creator and can elevate himself as the overman. And as the overman is not someone unearthly, Kubrick takes him back to Earth, where he gazes towards the blue planet in the epic finale.  

    But why does just only David Bowman becomes the Starchild? Kubrick tries to answer this question again by following Nietzsche. One of Nietzsche’s famous philosophical concepts is ‘Will to Power.’ Kubrick uses this notion in the form of the mysterious monolith. The monolith appears four times in the movie, each in a different course of the story. And each time, it provides (at least seems to provide) some sort of intelligence to further the evolution. 

    The Mysterious Monolith and Will to Power

    First, in the “Dawn of Men” sequence, the apes gain the knowledge to use bones as a weapon for their prey and self-defense. Second, in the moon, it indicates the scientists explore Jupiter. Third, we see the monolith orbits the Jupiter axis, leading Bowman’s pod to the stargate. And finally, it appears at the time of Bowman’s death as it converts him to the Starchild. If we watch closely, the film shows the monolith here as the intelligence to grow. Some may argue that the monolith may be a kind of communicating medium placed by extra-terrestrials. But, with Kubrick’s admiration towards Nietzsche (who doesn’t believe in anything unearthly) throughout the movie, we can conclude that the monolith is a symbol of humans will for wisdom, truth, and power. 

    Apart from all these extravagances, from the core ‘2001’ is a complex philosophical movie.”

    David Bowman has that will until the end. Kubrick designs this character with no emotional contact. Except for him, all the other important characters show some sort of emotionality. Dr Floyd shows his affection towards his daughter, Frank Poole seems quite sad when his parents wish him happy birthday via telephonic face time, and all other scientists are worried about the mysterious monolith. These all insights establish their psyche as well as backstories in a way.

    But for Bowman, he is just is what we see him in the picture. He doesn’t allow us to delve into his character’s psyche and does not contain any backstory. His deadpan face does not show much emotion. Maybe Kubrick wants him to become the character that lives in his solitude. Away from the other last men, who are too emotional to become wary of the “Will to Truth” (thus also the “Will to Power”), it’s only Bowman who can reach the mysterious room for enlightenment.  

    HAL- A Weary Machine, Afraid of Overcoming

    2001
    A scene from “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM).

    Among all, another thing that has to take into consideration, the role of HAL. Except for bowman, it is the only thing that can break free of all the obstacles and become superman. But despite having all the mechanical abilities, it shows emotions too. In that process, it’s also wary about the will to truth. In that wariness, it kills all the crew members. Also to overcome humanity, human has to follow the path of the abyss alone. In the end, the lobotomy of HAL breaks his dominance over humanity and its own wariness. With the song “Daisy Daisy” it retrogrades into his primitiveness and the final obstacle for humanity to surpass is overcome.

    Conclusion

    “2001: A Space Odyssey” is cinema’s clear masterpiece. Created by one of the cinema’s giants, Kubrick’s contemplation of Nietzschean philosophy is something that only can be felt, and can’t be described. And, after 53 years, this film and the philosophy it harbours undoubtedly way ahead of our imagination.       

    Support the Site: Consider becoming a sponsor to unlock exclusive, member-only content and help support The Movie Buff! 

    2001: A Space Odyssey David Bowman evolution exploration Frederich Nietzsche Hal man philosophy sci fi space Stanley Kubrick
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleFeature Article: The Doctor Will See You Now—How Realistic Are Medical Movies?
    Next Article Review: ‘The Cursed’ Touches on Some Deeper Themes, but is Really Only Skin Deep
    Abirbhab Maitra
    • Facebook

    Abirbhab Maitra is a lover of films and loves to write about them. Abirbhab endeavors to analyze films for their effect, and is open to any kind of healthy discussion on films. In addition, he is also an aspiring writer.

    Related Posts

    Independent March 2, 2026

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    Horror February 28, 2026

    Why Do We Keep Returning to the ‘Scream’ Films?

    Action February 22, 2026

    ‘Mercy’ Review: Chris Pratt is One Angry Man

    Independent February 13, 2026

    ‘Breakfast on Pluto’ and ‘Aruvi:’ A study of the Baddie Archetype in Cinema

    Tribute February 11, 2026

    Buff Tributes: The Iconic James Van Der Beek (1977-2026)

    Feature Article January 31, 2026

    How ‘Bugonia’ Portrays a World Where Conspiracies Feel Eerily Plausible

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Rosemead’ Review: A Mother and Son Stare Down the Barrel in a Tragic Eye-Opener

    By Vidal DcostaMarch 4, 20260

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    By Mark ZiobroMarch 2, 20260

    ‘Scream 7’ Review: A New Chapter as the Franchise Rewrites the Rules

    By Holly MarieMarch 2, 20260

    “Wuthering Heights” (2026) Review: A Preposterous Retelling, Rich in Aesthetic Yet Weightless in Text

    By Hector GonzalezMarch 1, 20260
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Rosemead’ Review: A Mother and Son Stare Down the Barrel in a Tragic Eye-Opener

    By Vidal DcostaMarch 4, 20260

    “Rosemead” is based on “A dying mother’s plan: Buy a gun. Rent a hotel room.…

    The Short Film ‘Jam Boy’ by Sriram Emani is Rich with Culture and Social Commentary

    By Mark ZiobroMarch 2, 20260

    Review: Rough Sex and Rougher Relationship Dynamics Intertwine in the Risqué ‘Pillion’

    By Vidal DcostaFebruary 24, 20260

    Interview: Filmmaker Sriram Emani on Exploring Self-Erasure and Breaking Patterns in his Debut Short ‘Jam Boy’

    By Vidal DcostaFebruary 20, 20260

    Acclaimed Violinist Lara St. John Talks About ‘Dear Lara’ Doc in Post SBIFF Interview

    By Mark ZiobroFebruary 16, 20260
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘The Innocents’ Review: One of the First Haunted House Films of the Modern Horror Era

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    The Movie Buff is a multimedia platform devoted to covering all forms of entertainment. From Hollywood Blockbusters to Classic Comfort faves. Broadcast Television, on-demand streaming, bingeworthy series'; We're the most versatile source.

    The Movie Buff is also the leading supporter of Indie film, covering all genres and budgets from around the globe.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.