Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Movie Buff
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    Action

    Review: With a Hyper Build-Up, ‘Wonder Woman 1984’ Ultimately Feels Disappointingly Derivative

    Jonathan Sim By Jonathan SimJanuary 1, 2021No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    Patty Jenkins returns to direct “Wonder Woman 1984,” a superhero movie that serves as a sequel to the 2017 film “Wonder Woman.” Gal Gadot reprises her role as Diana Prince, an Amazonian superhero living in 1984. The plot revolves around a Dreamstone, which can grant any wish. When the Dreamstone falls into the wrong hands, Diana must save the world.

    Jenkins did masterful work with the first “Wonder Woman” film, which was easily my favorite film in the DC Extended Universe, and one of my favorite superhero films. However, somewhere down the line, this sequel lost its way and became a disappointing follow-up.

    Superhero films have dominated the movie industry in recent years, and it’s easy to become tired of the same formula recycled in nearly every movie. We’ve reached the point where we no longer expect originality or freshness from superhero cinema, but instead, judge these films by the execution of their familiar ideas.

    Unfortunately, “Wonder Woman 1984” brings very little new to the table. At a meaty 2-hour-and-30-minute runtime, the film feels much longer than necessary, dragging at points and barely keeping us entertained with an un-compelling mystery.

    Pedro Pascal in a scene from “Wonder Woman 1984” (DC Comics, 2020).

    After a quick action scene in a mall with a robber who kidnaps a girl (how original), the film takes its sweet time to get to its first major action set-piece related to the plot. The action is generally where the film excels, as Jenkins once again showcases her ability to stage a thrilling sequence of punches and stunts.

    The issue is that every cool moment of every action scene is given away in the trailers. Hidden from the film’s marketing is the details of the film’s premise, which revolves around making wishes, a cartoonish concept that feels cheap and stale for a superhero flick.

    Good ideas exist within this premise, with Diane soon realizing that she will lose a lot if she fights the bad guy. Characters are pushed in different directions and have to make tough decisions regarding what they want to keep in their lives and what they have to let go of.

    While there are great ideas with this storyline, the film can still feel like it’s juggling too much, with Kristen Wiig’s character and the return of Steve Trevor, which leads me to the topic of the film’s characters.

    Gal Gadot is likable as usual in her role as Wonder Woman. She brings a fair amount of flavor to her scenes as the character. Chris Pine reprises his role as Steve Trevor. While I like the idea of him being a fish out of water in the future he never saw, there are missed opportunities for comedy, and it eventually feels like the writers ran out of things for him to do in the story.

    Kristen Wiig portrays Barbara Minerva, a shy, insecure woman whom Diana befriends early on. While Wiig’s comedic sensibilities are always a welcome presence, she portrays this character as a complete cliché.

    How many times have we seen the intelligent nerd with glasses turn to evil? Edward Nygma in “Batman Forever?” Aldrich Killian in “Iron Man 3?” Max Dillon in “The Amazing Spider-Man 2?” When will this never-ending archetype end? It’s a villain backstory that has been done to death.

    Chris Pine reprises his role of Steve Trevor in Patty Jenkins’ sequel.

    The film features another villain, Maxwell Lord, portrayed by Pedro Pascal, who recently starred in “The Mandalorian.” Lord is a charismatic businessman who wants to make his son proud of him. I enjoy this aspect of the character—his sympathetic, parent side.

    However, Pascal portrays the character with a hammy, over-the-top performance á la Nicolas Cage, and the combination of a larger-than-life, mustache-twirling villain mixed with a serious backstory doesn’t work. And when the film gives us a greater look into Lord’s tragic childhood, it is an unfortunate case of “too little, too late.”

    The film’s storyline is absurd, to say the least, with many having their wishes granted. Still, we never get a clear idea of the destruction of these events besides the occasional Washington D.C. street filled with people running. There isn’t enough to make us care about the events.

    It’s unfortunate how derivative this film feels; we have flying sequences that feel right out of Richard Donner’s “Superman.” While the film nails its intended ’80s nostalgia-fueled retro vibe, the messy narrative leads to an underwhelming sequel.

    Besides a few exciting action sequences (with one that reminded me of “Raiders of the Lost Ark”), the film can lack excitement and be very infused with romance that ultimately goes nowhere. These issues may be traced back to the fact that Allan Heinberg didn’t return to pen the script after the wonderful work he did on the first film.

    This is a superhero movie that many will be able to watch and enjoy. However, fans of the genre may recognize the recycled ingredients and the cornball dialogue ripped right out of a VOD ’80s action movie. There are many competent people on this project, but when you have a film with six different release dates, it’s a wonder why nobody gave this script another rewrite.

     

     

     

     

    Chris Pine comic book DC Gal Gadot Pedro Pascal Wonder Woman 1984
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe ‘Women’s Comedy Film Festival’ Brings the Gift of Laughter to Everyone During 2020’s Gloomy Lockdown

    Next Article Netflix Comparison: Which Series Does it Better: ‘The Haunting of Hill House’ or ‘The Haunting of Bly Manor?’
    Jonathan Sim
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram

    Jonathan Sim is a New York-based film critic and journalist. He loves movies, writing, magic tricks, basketball, Pixar, Star Wars, Marvel, Harry Potter, and all things pop culture.

    Related Posts

    Independent June 15, 2025

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    Independent June 12, 2025

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    World Cinema June 11, 2025

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    Movie Review June 10, 2025

    ‘The Day After’ Review: Epic TV Movie Demonstrates the 80s Don’t Hold Punches

    Movie Review June 9, 2025

    ‘High School U.S.A.’ Review: Old World Made for TV Comedy

    Action June 9, 2025

    ‘Ballerina’ Review: Blood, Sweat, and Ballet

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 11, 20250
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    A curious trend emerged across several films at this year’s Tribeca Festival: characters retreating to…

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    Indie Psychological Thriller ‘Audrey’ Releases First Trailer

    By Mark ZiobroJune 10, 20250

    ‘On a String’ Tribeca Review: Isabel Hagen’s Viola-Playing Heroine Finds Humor in Stagnation

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 8, 20250
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    “The Twilight Zone” Top 60 Episodes Ranked – Episodes 60-46

    The Movie Buff is a growing cinema and entertainment website devoted to covering Hollywood cinema and beyond. We cover all facets of film and television, from Netflix and Amazon Prime to theater releases and comfort favorites.

    The Movie Buff is also a leading supporter of indie film, featuring coverage of small, low-budget films and international cinema from Bollywood, Latin America, and beyond.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.