Though “Miracle on 34th Street” ends with a trial intended to commit a man who thinks heâs Santa Claus to an asylum, the film is not about hard evidence, but belief. There are many disbelievers in this film, none as staunch as a Macyâs higher-up and her daughter; and then there are others who donât know what to think. Released in 1947, âMiracleâ tells its tale in black and white, and in character arcs rather than an overabundance of Christmas cheer. It succeeds solely in the hands of its actors and its setting. Its inherent charm is that a department store â Christmas at its most commercial â becomes instead a breeding ground for sentimentality.
The plot begins simply, with a man playing Santa falling down drunk before the Thanksgiving parade, leading Macyâs employee Doris Walker (Maureen OâHara) to look for a fill-in. Her daughter (Natalie Wood), watching from a loft apartment in Manhattan comments that the replacement looks so much better than last yearâs Santa. The rub is that this one (played by Edmund Gwynn), says his name is Kris Kringle and that heâs the real Santa. That no one believes him is beside the point; he is hired by Macyâs under the hopes of bringing in more business and upselling some of their undersold toys. âGee, thatâs an elegant suit,â a janitor tells him in the dressing room. âSure makes a bum out of the one they gave you.â Itâs in this way that âMiracle on 34th Streetâ tries to warm its way into your heart.

The setting and set pieces in the film are iconic and convincing. Its opening parade will strike a chord with lovers of the Holiday season, as its popularity hasnât really dissipated in the 67 years since the filmâs release. But itâs the highlighted way of life of times past that the film really excels at. Macyâs has cemented itself as a major store spanning America, but here we see a department store when that really meant something. Online shopping and a franchise that spans 45 states wouldnât make sense to the characters in this film who couldnât even grasp the idea of a mobile phone. Gimbels, the other great department store in this film, went out of business in 1987. The film brings these stores to life in their heyday, showing the diversity of employees and walks of life. Itâs hard to imagine the title of ‘Head of the Toy Department’ carrying such heft in todayâs consumer culture, nor of a need for a psychologist for a department store.
âMiracle on 34th Streetâ is also filled with interesting characters and good performances. As Dorisâ daughter Susan, Natalie Wood plays a disbelieving young girl who really wants to believe, despite her motherâs insistence in looking at the world ârealistically.â The two play off of each other well. However, it is with the filmâs lawyer, Fred Gailey (John Payne) and Kris Kringle that young Natalie plays off of the most; itâs no surprise that Wood would go on to star in other films, most notable James Deanâs “Rebel Without a Cause.â As Gailey, Payne is one of the filmâs best actors, becoming Kringleâs advocate in every way as he fights to prove to the world that Santa Claus does exist. One scene between him and Doris shows the push and pull of logic vs. faith. And in a fit of irony, itâs the lawyer who advocates belief in miracles, and a store manager who looks at the world with fixed realism.
Amidst these, Gwynn ads an element of the unknown in his insistence of being Santa Claus with funny and clever dialogue throughout. âDo you enjoy impersonating me?â He asks one employee, and tells a disbelieving mother âI keep track of the toy market pretty closely.â Gwynn also ties many of the characters together, specifically Doris and her mother, and even Gailey. And as a climactic trial ensues with the State of NY attempting to prove he is not Santa Claus, challenges to the age-old myth are highlighted. Itâs also in the courtroom scenes that we see some of the filmâs most unsung acting. One scene between Charlie Halloran and Gene Lockhart, who plays Judge Harper, is wonderfully acted, dynamic, and utterly hysterical.
âA Miracle on 34th Streetâ has become a holiday classic, even so far as to be remade in 1994 with the venerable Richard Attenbourough as Kris Kringle. Itâs a warm film featuring good performances throughout, and an ending that serves to break up its overly serious courtroom drama. It is oddly devoid of the usual hallmarks of Christmas, such as snow-covered streets, decorations, or carolers, but makes its point despite these. The film doesnât carry the emotional impact of “It’s a Wonderful Life” or even “Elf;â but thatâs okay. Its approach is interesting and unique and youâll have a good time watching it. And maybe thatâs enough.
– by Mark Ziobro


