Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Movie Buff
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    Comedy

    Monty Python and the Holy Grail (PG)

    Matt DeCristo By Matt DeCristoNovember 17, 20132 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    Spawning in 1969, the legendary British sextet Monty Python would completely revolutionize the genre of comedy, and leave an eternal footprint on comedic history. From their groundbreaking skit-based television show “The Flying Circus” to three mainstream feature films (each of which will be reviewed in order of their release), the Pythons would go on to a fourteen year career as a group, before each would branch off into their own respective and successful roles in entertainment. The Monty Python influence on comedy has been compared favorably to The Beatles influence on music.

    The members would meet one another in the early 1960s; two were classmates at Oxford University, three were classmates at Cambridge University. Through various stage shows and performances, they would all eventually meet one another. They worked closely together on various projects until conjuring the idea for the hit television series.

    “The Flying Circus” would air from 1969-1974, and have a much larger impact than the mere forty-five episodes it produced. The show revolutionized comedic television, and became the major influence on the American hit “Saturday Night Live.” And like its American counterpart, the humor in the show is completely hit or miss – some parts will have you doubled over with uncontrollable laughter, others will have you watching, mouth ajar, in complete dismay. The one advantage Python humor has is that, unlike SNL, it tends to be more hit than miss. And when you add to the mix the British accent, well that just makes everything a whole lot funnier.

    grail2-300x165

    In between filming the third and fourth seasons of “Circus,” the Pythons began production of their first full length feature film, and in 1975, “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” was released. I can vividly remember the day I was introduced to the film; a sweltering summer day in 1991 when some friends and I rented the VHS cassette from the local supermarket. It instantly became one of my favorite movies. Twenty years after first watching it, I decided it was in order to watch the other two movies as well and review them as a series.

    Unlike the ensemble sketches of “The Flying Circus,” Grail consisted of a single and original plot, with the Pythons trademark humor encompassing from start to finish. Like all Python productions, the six founding members; Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Michael Palin, Terry Jones, Eric Idle, and Terry Gilliam, comprise the majority of the characters in the film – each playing multiple roles (including that of females) and demonstrating their knack for portraying a wide scope of characters in a flawless fashion.

    grail3-300x166The film follows the travels of the legendary King Arthur (Chapman) as he goes about recruiting knights to form his round table at Camelot. The opening scene will introduce the viewer to the Python’s brand of humor, and chances are you will know within the first five minutes if the film is for you or not.

    Arthur rides across the British countryside (using the term “ride” loosely; he skips about while his sidekick bangs two coconut shells together to mimic the sound of a nonexistent horses) encountering a bevy of unusual situations and fellow countrymen before gathering his knights; Bedevere the Wise (Jones) Lancelot the Brave (Cleese) Galahad the Pure (Palin) and the cowardly Robin (Idle). While heading to Camelot, the knights are given a quest by God himself to find the Holy Grail.

    The movie then follows the knights (as a group and then each on their own separate quest) as they embark on the mission, encountering various foes along the way, each more ridiculous than the one before, including a three-headed giant, a castle of horny women, a flame throwing sorcerer, and a killer rabbit.

    “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” is by far the best of the three Python feature films. It makes unique a played out classic tale, and keeps the viewer in a fit of laughter from its absurd opening to its head scratching finale. Python humor generally means anything can happen, most of which is completely unexpected and often ill-fitting, yet in “Grail” the laughs seems to connect for humor every step of the way with the cast never taking themselves, or their roles, too seriously.

    grail4-300x165

    Like all Python productions, “Grail” mixes the standard humor and character interaction with musical spoofs and songs, and the award winning animations of Terry Gilliam (who plays several minor characters in the film but does the majority of his contributions behind the scenes as he generally does with Python work).

    You will quickly see just how talented the members of Monty Python are. What is also obvious is the close bond each of the friends shared with one another. You will be envious that these men had highly successful careers doing nothing other than having a good time and being downright silly. And any social gathering (from weddings to funerals) consists of fans reciting the various lines from the film (even forty years later thus proving its influence and staying power).

    “Grail” features some explicit and gruesome (though comically over-the-top) violence and a feast of foul language but not too much to deter viewers with prudish values. The result is a hysterical movie, truly an all time great, that’s fun and appropriate for all ages – that is of course, if you find a connection with the humor.

    by – Matt Christopher

    1975 Eric Idle Graham Chapman John Cleese Michael Palin Monty Python and the Holy Grail Terry Gilliam Terry Jones
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe Iceman (R)
    Next Article Monty Python’s: Life of Brian (R)
    Matt DeCristo
    • Website
    • X (Twitter)

    Matt's a writer and content creator for the site. His reviews offer insight on the art of filmmaking from the standpoint of a casual fan. Check out mattdecristo.com and follow him on Instagram and Twitter @MattDeCristo.

    Related Posts

    Black Comedy June 16, 2025

    ‘Sister Midnight’ Review: Sapped of All Energy, a Defiant Domestic Goddess Bites Back

    Independent June 15, 2025

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    Interview June 13, 2025

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    Independent June 12, 2025

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    World Cinema June 11, 2025

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    TV Series June 11, 2025

    TV Review: How Seth Rogen’s ‘The Studio’ Marries Art and Commerce—and Why It Resonates as a Masterpiece

    2 Comments

    1. M on November 20, 2013 7:15 PM

      This film is just brilliant.

      Reply
    2. Me on December 20, 2013 12:48 AM

      Got to love sir Robins scenes.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Sister Midnight’ Review: Sapped of All Energy, a Defiant Domestic Goddess Bites Back

    By Vidal DcostaJune 16, 20250

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Sister Midnight’ Review: Sapped of All Energy, a Defiant Domestic Goddess Bites Back

    By Vidal DcostaJune 16, 20250

    Trapped in a loveless marriage and repulsed by the repetitive need to conform, Uma (Radhika…

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    Indie Psychological Thriller ‘Audrey’ Releases First Trailer

    By Mark ZiobroJune 10, 20250
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    “The Twilight Zone” Top 60 Episodes Ranked – Episodes 60-46

    The Movie Buff is a growing cinema and entertainment website devoted to covering Hollywood cinema and beyond. We cover all facets of film and television, from Netflix and Amazon Prime to theater releases and comfort favorites.

    The Movie Buff is also a leading supporter of indie film, featuring coverage of small, low-budget films and international cinema from Bollywood, Latin America, and beyond.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.