Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Movie Buff
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    31 Days of Halloween

    Review: 1920’s ‘Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde’ at its Most Artful, Courtesy of John Barrymore

    Rita Amer By Rita AmerOctober 1, 2020No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    Robert Louis Stevenson’s classic novella “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” was adapted three times for screen in the Golden Age of Hollywood: the 1920 silent version starring John Barrymore; the 1931 version starring Fredrick March; and the 1941 starring Spencer Tracy. One version is not objectively better than the others. But I contend that John Barrymore is the most artful and compelling Jekyll/Hyde.

    Though the 1920 version is over 100 years old, it is still enjoyable, even chilling. In fact, its lack of human speech is its strength. Since the scriptwriters were limited to inter-titles to present text, they avoided the philosophical discourses and moral prolixity that weighed down later versions. The script is as lean as the original novella; it relies on John Barrymore’s face and body to tell us of Hyde’s depravity and Jekyll’s horror and shame.

    Barrymore (grandfather of Drew Barrymore, in case you are interested) was a luminous comet blazing through the ether of the New York stage, along with his brother Lionel and sister Ethel. John Barrymore was as famous as he was mercurial. He enjoyed so much wine and so many women that he became a Byronic hero backstage, as well as onstage. On stage and in front of the camera he governed his temperament with the technique and discipline of a consummate thespian. His performance is made eternally fresh by the elasticity of his emotional expression and protean physical vocabulary.

    “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” 1920 poster, Paramount Pictures.

    Barrymore uses his ethereal beauty and exquisite profile to lift us up to the level of the angelic Dr. Jekyll. A man too soulful and too blindly pure to acknowledge and thereby control his baser nature. His self-loathing caused by his suppressed physical desires impels him to try to split off the lust, greed, and anger that lurk within. His denial ends up creating the exemplar of toxic masculinity—Mr. Hyde.

    Barrymore’s every gesture and step have the cultivated spontaneity of a dancer. He is elegant as Jekyll and then his sudden transformation from Jekyll to Hyde has the percussive grace of a paroxystic ballet. He convulses into a human more and more disfigured by every evil act, like an inverse portrait of Dorian Gray.  

    John Barrymore’s Hollywood epithet was ‘The Great Profile’ as a result of his aquiline nose and noble forehead. Dr. Jekyll and Mrs. Hyde boasts another notable profile. Louis Wolheim, as the music hall proprietor, sports a nose often broken by too many fistfights. When he tried to have his nose surgically repaired the studio he was under contract to, United Artists filed a successful injunction to prevent it. Barrymore and Wolheim were very good friends. All the Barrymores met Wolheim in a play and were responsible for giving him his break in Hollywood. Seeing the two friends on screen together is a ‘Beauty and Beast’ experience.

    The rest of the film is servable to frame Barrymore and Wolheim’s performances. Be sure to watch a restored version. The unrestored version is so damaged it looks like all the action takes place in a blizzard.

    You can see Barrymore at the end of his career as a waggish troublemaker in “Midnight” (1939).

     

     

     

     

    classic film Dr. Jekyll John Barrymore monster Mr. Hyde science
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleReview: ‘Deliverance’ Confusing, and Not the Terror/Survivalist Experience One Expects

    Next Article Review: ‘ Midsommar’ is a Slow Burn Psychological Thriller
    Rita Amer
    • Website

    Rita has been a cinephile since birth. Though she works a day job, her evenings and heart belong to celluloid (and video). Rita has a Masters in Dance and a Juris Doctor; but those accomplishments pale in comparison to sharing the best and worst of cinema with our readers. You can also follow Rita on her podcast, ‘Foibles,’ where she talks about film and literature.

    Related Posts

    Independent June 15, 2025

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    Independent June 12, 2025

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    World Cinema June 11, 2025

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    Movie Review June 10, 2025

    ‘The Day After’ Review: Epic TV Movie Demonstrates the 80s Don’t Hold Punches

    Movie Review June 9, 2025

    ‘High School U.S.A.’ Review: Old World Made for TV Comedy

    Action June 9, 2025

    ‘Ballerina’ Review: Blood, Sweat, and Ballet

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 11, 20250
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    A curious trend emerged across several films at this year’s Tribeca Festival: characters retreating to…

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    Indie Psychological Thriller ‘Audrey’ Releases First Trailer

    By Mark ZiobroJune 10, 20250

    ‘On a String’ Tribeca Review: Isabel Hagen’s Viola-Playing Heroine Finds Humor in Stagnation

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 8, 20250
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    “The Twilight Zone” Top 60 Episodes Ranked – Episodes 60-46

    The Movie Buff is a growing cinema and entertainment website devoted to covering Hollywood cinema and beyond. We cover all facets of film and television, from Netflix and Amazon Prime to theater releases and comfort favorites.

    The Movie Buff is also a leading supporter of indie film, featuring coverage of small, low-budget films and international cinema from Bollywood, Latin America, and beyond.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.