For a series that left behind its source material in the midst of sequel fever, itâs fitting that Freddy gets a worthy adversary this time around. And while I found Part 3 lackluster and too comic for a horror film (Iâm certainly the minority here for âNightmareâ fans), âA Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Masterâ rectifies a lot of the previous filmâs issues. The film would call back Kristen from the previous entry (recast by Tuesday Knight in lieu of Patricia Arquette from Part 3) as well as two other hospital residents (Rodney Eastman and Ken Sagoes). However, whether due to the writing teamâor for other reasonsââThe Dream Masterâ becomes atmospheric and scary again, even if comic Freddy still remains.Â
The main reason the film throws back to its more frightening roots lies in its reliance on its teenagers once again. Where Part 3 felt too chaperoned by adults and too trapped in its psychiatric hospital, âThe Dream Masterâ once again features scared kids on their own who must figure things out. The aforementioned Kristen is one of them, as is her boyfriend, Rick (Andras Jones), his sister Alice (Lisa Wilcox), and two friends Sheila and Dan (Toy Newkirk and Danny Hassel, respectively). Theyâre alone because their parents are AWOL. Kristenâs mom is still controlling and disinterested, and Alice and Rickâs father is a drunk and their mother has passed away.Â
More Atmosphere this Time
The filmâs opening sequence is scary enough, also, featuring Kristen dreaming, bringing Joey and Kincaid back in (Eastman and Sagoes) before being bit by Kincaidâs dog. Thereâs a clear rift between Kincaid and Joey and the rest of Kristenâs friends (especially Rick) that has to do with their being viewed as creepy due to their history of psych issuesâwhich we of course know to be Krueger issues. Suffice to say, Krueger does come back. The scene in which he does and claims his first victim is rather sinister, and Krueger (reprised by Robert Englund) leaves the jokes aside for now. The way that the Dream Warriors from Part 3 are marked for death has a âFinal Destinationâ ring to it. And Krueger opting for more realistic kills at the filmâs beginning lets it ring more hallow than the caricatures that answered for his murders in âDream Warriors.âÂ
What also works is that Director Renny Harlin sets up some eerie set pieces and a town that has an equally creepy air to it. Thereâs the old Krueger house at 1428 Elm that is now abandoned, which works its way into the various childrenâs dreams. Rick and company visit it once as he tells the story of how Krueger came to be to his friend Dan. The red door and green shutters contrast with the dilapidated structure, and whole scene has the feel of all those âHalloweenâ films where would-be victims are drawn to the Myers house.Â
Its About the Kids This Time

âThe Dream Masterâ also defies stereotypes with its motley crew of teens who band together. Rick is into karate and rocks this Robert Smith-esque hairdo, while Dan is your standard jock. Sheila is a bookworm and her friend Debbie (Brooke Theiss) is the town beauty. Yet they all work together. And while they exist for little other reason than to be victims for Krueger, writers William Kotzwinkle and Brian Helgeland given them enough backstory to make them feel real and this town to feel lived in.Â
Thatâs not to say âThe Dream Masterâ is perfect or a return to form, as itâs not. Itâs really the first film in the âNightmareâ franchise past the first one to be its own thing. It isnât tethered to the happenings or characters from part one. And it doesn’t hinge completely on Kruegerâs killing methods or jokes (though they are there). We care about these kids enough to want them to be okay, which is what makes the film work. That, and the fact that this film, released in 1988, is totally â80s helps. The opening track, âNightmareâ (performed by star Tuesday Knight) and âAnything, Anythingâ by Dramarama are quintessential â80s gems that give âDream Warriorsâ by Dokken from the previous film a run for its money. This was the first âNightmareâ film to feel like the decade it belongs to, and thatâs a credit.Â
A Decent ‘Nightmare’ Addition

Englundâs treatment is hit or miss. As Freddy, he received top billing in this film, yet âDream Masterâ is oddly not about him. He kills an abundance of kids here, so horror lovers will not be unsatisfied. Some of his kills are laughable (one on the beach with sunglasses is the worst offender), while another where he becomes invisible are oddly creative. And then some of the later special effects delve into body horror, the most profound the series has seen thus far. And amidst it all, the imperative of Alice to try and save as many of her friends as she can remains, and adds a necessity to the film missing from Part 3. What happens here matters, and the acting by most of the players lets us know their stories matter, too. Theyâre not mere cannon fodder, and the extra writing treatment given this film shows in spades.Â
At the end of the day, âThe Dream Masterâ is a more fitting entry than I remember. It makes up for a lot of the comedy and jilted feeling of âDream Warriors,â and features kids we can care about. The kills by Krueger are creative and often vicious, the soundtrack is deep â80s, and the cinematography paints a dismal, disturbed town that feels like an eerie place. Thereâs more happening here than Kruegerâs kills, and it shows. While the series would waft in and out of incredulity, here the filmmakers leave a good horror film in their wake, and the most character driven âNightmareâ to date. A solid film and good franchise addition overall.
Check streaming options for ways to watch “A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 4: The Dream Master.”Â


