Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Movie Buff
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • About
      • Critics
      • Press & Testimonials
      • Friends of the Buff
      • Terms of Use
      • Thank You!
    • Film Reviews & Coverage
      • Movie Reviews
      • TV/Streaming Reviews
      • Film Festival Coverage
      • Interviews
    • Podcasts
    • Indie Film
      • Reviews & Articles
    • Advertise
    • Contact
      • Write for us
    The Movie Buff
    Horror

    Feature: How Do the ‘Jaws’ Sequels Stand Up to the Original?

    Oscar Collins By Oscar CollinsAugust 13, 2020No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

    In 1975, Steven Spielberg released a movie that became film’s first summer blockbuster. From its script to its actors to its music, “Jaws” stands today as a beloved classic. The iconic movie sparked three sequels—and critics and audiences have had much to say about them. So how did these follow-ups compare to the original?

    Take a look at why many consider “Jaws” to be a stand-alone film.

    The “Jaws” Legacy, 45 Years Later

    It’s essential to consider “Jaws” as a whole before you dive into any sequels. The film effectively turned Hollywood on its head. With “Star Wars,” “Jaws” was used as a model for today’s movie trends. A high box office profit became a top priority for studios—and action-filled movies that featured straightforward storylines allowed them to achieve those goals. The summer blockbuster was born.

    Universal Pictures debuted “Jaws” on over 400 screens across America. “Jaws” has since earned more than $1 billion worldwide. Its simple yet suspenseful plot has resonated with critics and audiences for 45 years. “Jaws” created a culture that stands tall nearly half a century after its release. After all, who couldn’t identify those famous bass notes as a possible shark attack?

    The sequels fail to understand that a movie can’t only feature abrupt, gory scenes where animated animals explode for shock value.”

    Without “Jaws,” it’s unlikely many modern hits would exist at all. That’s why it’s difficult to compare its sequels. A franchise’s first film tends to be its best. But if “Star Wars” could produce a follow-up that fans consider better than its original, “Jaws” should’ve been able to do better.

    A Stray From What Makes “Jaws” Worthwhile

    Roy Scheider as Chief Martin Brody in “Jaws 2” (Universal Pictures, 1978).

    “Jaws 2” was released two years after “Jaws.” It came with many changes. The film was originally based on a novel by Peter Benchley. He and Spielberg didn’t return for any sequels. Instead, the story took on a new director—and a new angle entirely. “Jaws 2” follows a story like its predecessor. But rather than continue its adventure-like approach, “Jaws 2” adopts a slasher-esque feel that was popular way back when.

    The most significant disappointment from “Jaws 2” might be this switch. The original movie had sharks at its forefront. That said, it wasn’t about deadly sea creatures if you take a deeper dive. “Jaws” followed three men with different outlooks on life as they came together for a greater cause. The follow-ups don’t offer a similar take on close human relationships—it’s all about sharks.

    The “Jaws” sequels may be a fun way to spend a Sunday afternoon—but they lack all that made “Jaws” a hit.”

    Viewers love “Jaws” because each character offers humanity. You follow well-rounded, diverse people as they battle a single problem. The sequels fail to understand that a movie can’t only feature abrupt, gory scenes where animated animals explode for shock value. It’s true that more realistic issues like heat-induced illness at a local beach wouldn’t make a fun film, but it’s important to have balance.

    If you viewed “Jaws 2,” “Jaws 3-D” and “Jaws: The Revenge” as movies made separate from “Jaws,” you’d at least be able to laugh along with them.

    The Sequels Lack Fundamental Components

    One of the robots used to portray the shark in “Jaws” on display.

    From dialogue to cinematography, it’s like each sequel decided to skip certain movie necessities. It could be that studio heads wanted to capitalize on every “Jaws” film as a blockbuster hit with flashy visual effects and bloody shark-based plotlines.

    Without Spielberg to lead, it’s clear that “Jaws” as a franchise steered away from important basics to focus on other endeavors. That’s its main fault.

    The first “Jaws” filmed offered suspense that only Alfred Hitchcock had mastered before. Spielberg made a point to never truly reveal a shark. Instead, you knew one was about to strike as tension built up through visual and musical cues. There was also a more concentrated focus on memorable dialogue. You’ll probably resonate with lines from “Jaws” more so than you’ll enjoy whatever a “Jaws 3-D” character has to say.

    You can trace each sequel’s blunder back to changes with directors, writers, and editors. A follow-up guided by Spielberg likely would’ve taken a more enjoyable route when compared to what was actually created. His take on “Jaws 2” involved an entirely different approach that producers turned down. While it’s hard to say whether it would’ve been a better film than “Jaws,” it’s fun to speculate.

    While Sequels Can Be Fun, “Jaws” Stands Alone

    The “Jaws” sequels may be a fun way to spend a Sunday afternoon—but they lack all that made “Jaws” a hit. Be sure to watch them as stand-alone slasher comedy flicks if you ever decide to view them. That could be how they were intended, anyways.

    Chief Brody horror Jaws Peter Benchley sequels shark Steven Spielberg
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleReview: ‘Lifeline’ Highlights Mental Health and Hope Amidst Despair
    Next Article 5 Movies Desperately in Need of a Remake
    Oscar Collins
    • Website
    • X (Twitter)

    Author Bio: Oscar Collins is the founder and editor-in-chief at @'Modded,' where he writes about a variety of topics. Follow him on Twitter @TModded for regular updates.

    Related Posts

    Horror June 7, 2025

    ‘Urban Legend’ — What Do We Know About the Reboot?

    Horror May 29, 2025

    ‘Fear Street: Prom Queen’ Will Appeal Most to Nostalgia Lovers or Horror Newcomers

    Feature Article May 25, 2025

    Unpacking the Intricate and Terrifying Enigma of Peacock’s ‘The Day of the Jackal’

    Thriller May 19, 2025

    ‘In the Flesh’ A Tense Thrill Ride that Keeps You on Your Toes Until the Very End 

    Movie Review May 18, 2025

    ‘Portrait of God:’ A Great Concept and Crafty Filmmaking Result in a Perfect Horror Short   

    Movie Review May 17, 2025

    ‘Abracitos is a Terrifying Ten-Minute Tale that Will Leave its Mark  

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    ‘Cuerpo Celeste’ Tribeca Review: A Solar Eclipse Over Grief and Growing Up

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 11, 20250
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Indie Film Highlights

    ‘Honeyjoon’ Tribeca Review: A Tender—If Tonally Uneven—Study on the Stubborn Bonds Between Mothers and Daughters

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 15, 20250

    A curious trend emerged across several films at this year’s Tribeca Festival: characters retreating to…

    Interview: Oscar Nominee Jessica Sanders On Her Upcoming Comedy Short, ‘I Want To Feel Fun’

    By Vidal DcostaJune 13, 20250

    Tribeca Review: ‘A Tree Fell in the Woods’—But the Drama Barely Rustled

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 12, 20250

    Indie Psychological Thriller ‘Audrey’ Releases First Trailer

    By Mark ZiobroJune 10, 20250

    ‘On a String’ Tribeca Review: Isabel Hagen’s Viola-Playing Heroine Finds Humor in Stagnation

    By Paul Emmanuel EnicolaJune 8, 20250
    Spotlight on Classic Film

    ‘Gone With the Wind’ Review: Epic Film from the Golden Age of Hollywood

    ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ QCinema 2024 Review: A Thoughtful, If Rushed, Study of Revenge and Redemption

    ‘Thirteen Women’ Review: A Precursor of the Slasher Genre, with a Devilishly Divine Femme Fatale at its Helm

    “The Twilight Zone” Top 60 Episodes Ranked – Episodes 60-46

    The Movie Buff is a growing cinema and entertainment website devoted to covering Hollywood cinema and beyond. We cover all facets of film and television, from Netflix and Amazon Prime to theater releases and comfort favorites.

    The Movie Buff is also a leading supporter of indie film, featuring coverage of small, low-budget films and international cinema from Bollywood, Latin America, and beyond.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Copyright @2011-2025 by The Movie Buff | Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.