âThe Snowmanâ looks so great on paper â director Tomas Alfredsson (âTinker Tailor Soldier Spyâ, âLet the Right One Inâ) helms it, Martin Scorsese is executive producer, and Michael Fassbender stars â and it shouldnât go wrong in execution, but holy damn, it does.
Itâs so bad that it would be justified if Alfredsson disowned it. Instead, heâs stated in interviews that production was rushed and they werenât able to film 15 per cent of the screenplay. That explains some plot holes that a monster truck could drive through.
The story follows Harry Hole⦠Thatâs seriously his name â but to be fair, itâs supposed to be pronounced âholy.â Michael Fassbender stars as Harry, whoâs supposed to be a legendary Norwegian detective. We meet him well outside of his glory days as he wakes up in a hut on a childrenâs playground after a night of drinking.
Harry is called to investigate a missing persons case with Katrine Bratt (Rebecca Ferguson), a detective whoâs worked with missing persons, and when they find a snowman on the womanâs lawn, it launches them on an incoherent investigation into whoâs making these snowmen and killing these women. Their first lead is a cold case from nine years ago about a missing woman. Harry stumbles across it because Katrine took the case from the files room.
The storyâs an incomprehensible mess. Thereâs a huge sub-plot about Oslo putting in a bid to host the Winter Olympics, which starts to feel irrelevant to the case rather quickly. The filmâs trailer suggests that the killer taunts the police, but itâs only one card that reads âHello mister police,â telling Harry that heâs leaving a snowman somewhere. He literally gives Mr. Police no clues â unless you count the not-so-creepy snowmen.
The two editors fail to make a coherent story, as new developments come and go in a confusing mess. If itâs true a lot of pages of the screenplay werenât even filmed, they wouldnât have had much to work with â and there are obvious pieces of the puzzle missing. Itâs truly just a hack job of a film.
The editingâs most bizarre aspect is Val Kilmerâs role. The first time we hear him talking we donât even see his face, and when we see him speaking, his lines are horribly dubbed by another actor. Itâs a strange performance since two of the scenes heâs in are completely silent. He was reportedly recovering from a kind-of oral cancer and his tongue was swollen â so his lines likely were hard to understand â but itâs distracting that they have to edit around him talking and the ADR looks terrible. It would have been better to recast the role, but instead itâs lazy that they left it in there knowing how bad it looks. His performance is really the only bad aspect of the cast â everyone else is fine â just because his scenes are so awkward.
This filmâs based on Jø Nesboâs series of books featuring Harry Hole, but the character likely wonât be on the big screen again anytime soon. Heâs not that interesting, and based on what we see of him, he doesnât seem like a great detective, either. The most characterization we get is that heâs a drunk and a father figure to an ex-girlfriendâs son, as he seemed to be his stepdad at one point. Katrine Bratt almost gets more characterization than him, and sheâs fine.
A problem with the film is that it lacks any real tension. All the trailers claim itâs based on the âterrifying best-seller,â but thereâs no terror and the only chilling thing about it is how cold Norway looks. Everything that could be gritty turns out to be silly â and the snowmen arenât ominous at all. One thing that could have been scary is if they took a page out of the playbook of âThe Officeâ and made a whole field of snowmen Harry would have to navigate through. But unfortunately, âThe Snowmanâ doesnât have a creative bone in its snowy body.
– by Daniel Prinn



2 Comments
Funny review – this guy is tough!
He is tough…but the general consensus I’ve heard is he’s correct. It’s too bad; I love Michael Fassbender in the X-Men films and would love to see him in a solid project.