Comic books have a way of creating icons without even trying. Let me start by saying that Director Zack Snyderâs highly anticipated “Man of Steel” is a good movie. However, the problem with reviewing movies like this is that itâs virtually impossible to do without comparing it to a legion of previous attemptsâin this case the iconic 1978 film âSuperman.â Many fans simply find no way to view another rendition of this famed superhero as acceptable amidst the accolades presented by Christopher Reeveâs portrayal of the Man of Steel, Lex Luther as the villain, or the sinister glow of green Kryptonite rendering Superman weaker than man. However, in âMan of Steel,â what we find is a supremely entertaining film. It is darker and more emotional, which should serve as a fitting new franchise entry to please both fans and newcomers alike.
One of the main differences between this film and previous “Superman” movies is the attention and detail it gives the lives on Krypton before sending baby Kal-El to Earth. Superman’s father Jor-El is here re-imagined as a man of action, portrayed wonderfully in a subdued performance by Russell Crowe. Kryptonâs core has been irreparably damaged by drilling attempts to sustain energy on the planet, and is all but doomed. In haste, Jor-El and his wife send their son Kal-Elâthe first natural born Kryptonian in centuriesâto Earth to give him a chance to live a natural life and to serve as a symbol of hope to the weaker planet. At the same time, a coup has begun by the strong willed military leader General Zod (Michael Shannon). This leads to his eventual defeat and exileâbut not before promising to find Kal-El and reap revenge.
An Origin Story Done Right
The beginning of âMan of Steelâ is quick and violent; the following scenes, however, are slow moving and purposeful. They set the stage for Kal-Elânow the grown man Clark Kentâto discover who he is while fighting the morals of saving lives versus keeping his secret hidden.
Given unfavorable reviews of previous efforts such as “The Cold Light of Day,â one of the high points of âMan of Steelâ is honestly the portrayal of Superman brought by Henry Cavill. He plays Clark Kent with the right amount of intrigue and heart, and Superman with the right amount of humility to make him a truly engrossing character. Its early scenes focus on a young Clark and the heroic acts he commits while attempting to hide his true identity.
However, flashbacks show the moral nature instilled in him, a by-product of growing up on Earth and being naturally born. For instance, amidst his fatherâs reproach, he saves a bus full of kids from drowning and almost gives away his secret. The scene underscores the necessity of Clark coming to grips with the way he wants to live as he grapples with why he is different than everybody else. There is one scene in the filmâwhich will not be spoiled hereâinvolving Clark and his father on a highway that reaches deep into the man Clark is trying to be. It is one of the most effective and heart wrenching scenes in any superhero movie to date.
Good Acting from All the Major Players
Acting all around is very good. As Clarkâs father, Kevin Kostner gives a heart-warming performance as Jonathan Clark, a man who wants his son to live a normal life even though heâs not sure he can. As Mrs. Kent, Diane Lane also does well. It is encouraging to see the movie cast so many big name actors and somehow be the better for it. Even Laurence Fishburn, playing the iconic Perry White of the Daily Planet, manages to blend into the movie, adding to a compelling story. There are no show stealers here. “Man of Steel” also uses Lois Lane (Amy Adams) in a fun and believable wayâshe helps uncover the story of Superman’s identityâas well as Christopher Meloni as a initially-distrusting military colonel.
Of the cast, Michael Shannon turns in what could arguably be the movie’s best performance as the evil and misguided General Zod. And though the breakneck pace and special effects that ensues during he and Superman’s inevitable confrontation will doubtless please fans of movies such as this (an entire city is in fact, destroyed), the only criticism is it feels as though writers David Goyer and Christopher Nolan (The âDark Knightâ Trilogy) cut a few corners in dialogue between the two, leading to an almost too convenient excuse for their battle scenes.
A Film Garnering Some Unnecessary Criticism
For instance, as a hologram of Jor-El entreats Zod that Krypton and Earth could live in peace, Zodâs dismissive answer surmounts to little more than, Thatâs too much work, Iâd rather just kill everyone. Additionally, critics have thus far denounced the violence of âMan of Steel,â particularly the final battle between Zod and Superman. While we wonât spoil that conclusion here, I have to say that Clarkâs actions are so thoroughly justified I don’t understand people’s problems with this aspect of the script. While one scene certainly goes against Superman’s ‘turn the other cheek’ legacy, given the destruction Zod wreaks in the name of Krypton (he knowingly kills what one could only assume to be 500,000 people), Clark canât really ask him to sit down to peace talks.
“Man of Steel” runs a little long at 143 minutes. However, there is a good amount of back-story and plot to get through, so itâs ultimately forgivable. The soundtrack, in particular the new theme song, is absolutely gorgeous and haunting. It underscores a sense of tragedy and honor in Supermanâs existence missing from previous incarnations.
A Great Opener Setting Up Things to Come
This is a good film. Itâs well put together, well acted, and, at the end of the day, is one of the most enjoyable “Superman” experiences since the original 1978 opener. It sets up what we can only assume to be a franchise effectively, boasting incredible and believable special effects. And with Snyder, Goyer, and Nolanâs touch, it also adds a sense of urgency to the legend of Superman. It was time for an update. An invincible man of steel is captivatingâ¦but the more interesting story is not how he does it, but why. Thankfully, âMan of Steelâ provides an excellent opening glimpse into this question we can only hope subsequent films will continue to explore.
Support the Site:Â Consider becoming a sponsor to unlock exclusive, member-only content and help support The Movie Buff!

3 Comments
The only thing that put me of is that Lois meets CK before he starts at the Daily Planet. And the secret identity of Clark Kent is null and void. That aspect to the legendary Man Of Steel shouldn’t have changed.. Also, I prefer the classic suit… The new one is a little cold and distant for my taste.
I agree Superfan21. I don’t really see the point of Lois meeting Clark in this film. I also agree, the suit is a little odd but I did like the movie overall. I hope the next one improves upon a solid start.
Pingback: » The Iceman (R)